After more than seven years and multiple federal and state court rulings, the saga of Apple, Inc.’s exit search policy continues. In an October amendment to its September ruling that time spent in exit searches constituted hours worked, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Apple can pursue its claim that exit search time is so de minimis as to be non-compensable (Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., No. 15-17382 (Amended October 29, 2020).
As previously reported, the California Supreme Court ruled in February that Apple must pay employees for time they spend undergoing security screening of personal items after clocking out at the end of their shift — a question the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal asked the California Supreme Court to answer more than two years ago.
As part of its appeal to that ruling, Apple had argued that the time spent on an exit search shouldn’t be compensated because it was often so brief as to be considered de minimis, which refers to amounts of time so small that they’re difficult to track, such as booting up a computer in the morning or locking up a store at night.
In its September ruling, the Ninth Circuit held that because Apple didn’t raise this issue before the district court, it had forfeited it. In the October 29 revision to that ruling, however, the court stated that it was actually unclear whether Apple had raised the de minimis argument before the lower court. It then granted Apple’s request to argue the issue when the case is remanded.